Review of an manuscript submitted to the conference

Article’s title
Does the paper match the scope of the conference?
Yes
Does the paper title reflect the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the paper embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Is the paper clearly written and easily understood?
Understood with effort
Do conclusions illustrate the research results, findings, and recommendations, providing suggestions for future research?
Partially
Are the references full and grounded?
Yes
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article

1. Присутнє дублювання слів "fermentation":  Yogurt production was carried out using the following technology: pasteurization, cooling to a temperature of (36 ± 1) °C, fermentation, fermentation, cooling.

2.  У твердженні є суперечність (Якщо ступінь синерезису збільшується, то числове значення повинно зростати, а не зменшуватись. Наприклад, "збільшується з 50% до 60%". / Дослідження показали, що високі температури пастеризації сприяють зниженню ступеня синерезису з 60% до 50%.): Syneresis research revealed that at high pasteurization temperatures, the degree of syneresis increases from 60 to 50%. 

I confirm that there is no conflict of interest regarding the reviewed paper
I confirm that I have the appropriate expertise to review this paper