Review of an manuscript submitted to the conference

Article’s title
Does the paper match the scope of the conference?
Yes
Does the paper title reflect the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the paper embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Is the paper clearly written and easily understood?
Easily understood
Do conclusions illustrate the research results, findings, and recommendations, providing suggestions for future research?
Yes
Are the references full and grounded?
Yes
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article

In this work, the authors present research on the stabilization and clarification of wine, since this is an important technological stage in production, which affects the quality characteristics of this product. The authors propose to use modified bentonite samples in wine technology as those that, in combination with clarification, reduce the acidity of wine, which allows to improve its organoleptic indicators. The work is relevant and requires further research in this direction.
A small remark: Please translate the title of Table 2 into English.

I confirm that there is no conflict of interest regarding the reviewed paper
I confirm that I have the appropriate expertise to review this paper