Review of an manuscript submitted to the conference

Article’s title

Catalytic Properties of CeO2 and Its Nanocomposites with SBA-15 Mesoporous Molecular Sieve in Cyclic Carbamates Production from CO2 and Aminoalcohols

Does the paper match the scope of the conference?

Yes

Does the paper title reflect the content and purpose of the article?

Yes

Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?

Yes

Does the paper embrace contemporary issues in the area?

Yes

Is the paper clearly written and easily understood?

Easily understood

Do conclusions illustrate the research results, findings, and recommendations, providing suggestions for future research?

Yes

Are the references full and grounded?

Yes

Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article

This paper presents a research on CeO₂-based catalysts for sustainable cyclic carbamate synthesis. The focus on CO₂ utilization as a chemical feedstock aligns with global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while developing sustainable chemical processes. Overall, the research makes a valuable contribution to the development of catalytic systems for CO₂ utilization, with potential applications in pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis. There are a few language and formatting issues throughout the manuscript. In particular, Fig. 4B is mostly empty and needs to be fixed, and additional proofreading is required to correct the mistypes and spelling errors. Overall, the paper can be recommended for publication after addressing the above remarks.

I confirm that there is no conflict of interest regarding the reviewed paper

✔

I confirm that I have the appropriate expertise to review this paper

✔