Review of an manuscript submitted to the conference

Article’s title

A new method for increasing the efficiency of the conversion of the energy of the DC voltage into pulse energy

Does the paper match the scope of the conference?

Yes

Does the paper title reflect the content and purpose of the article?

Yes

Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?

Yes

Does the paper embrace contemporary issues in the area?

Partially

Is the paper clearly written and easily understood?

Easily understood

Do conclusions illustrate the research results, findings, and recommendations, providing suggestions for future research?

Partially

Are the references full and grounded?

Partially

Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article

1. In the Introduction, the authors have no references to provide the background.

2. It is not specified, how the authors calculated the efficiency of the energy conversion.

3. I cannot fully understand, what the authors mean by "Since the classical analysis methodology analysis of transient processes in RLC circuits does not consider specific values of the resistance R"?

4. In the Conclusions, the authors should shortly specify the proposed idea in addition to its advantages.

I confirm that there is no conflict of interest regarding the reviewed paper

✔

I confirm that I have the appropriate expertise to review this paper

✔