Does the paper match the scope of the conference?
Yes
Does the paper title reflect the content and purpose of the article?
No
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the paper embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Is the paper clearly written and easily understood?
Easily understood
Do conclusions illustrate the research results, findings, and recommendations, providing suggestions for future research?
Partially
Are the references full and grounded?
Yes
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
1. The topic of the paper indicates the provision of the structural state of the foam material by the program developed by the authors. However, this document describes the porosity calculation. It is known that structure and porosity are different concepts. The authors should improve the topic of this article
2. In conclusion, the reasons for the useful determination of the porosity of foamed materials in production should be expanded
I confirm that there is no conflict of interest regarding the reviewed paper
✔
I confirm that I have the appropriate expertise to review this paper
✔