Review of an manuscript submitted to the conference

Article’s title

Temperature Influence on the Rheological Properties of C9 Hydrocarbon Resin Solutions

Does the paper match the scope of the conference?

Yes

Does the paper title reflect the content and purpose of the article?

Yes

Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?

Yes

Does the paper embrace contemporary issues in the area?

Yes

Is the paper clearly written and easily understood?

Easily understood

Do conclusions illustrate the research results, findings, and recommendations, providing suggestions for future research?

Yes

Are the references full and grounded?

Yes

Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article

I have reviewed the abstract and find it to be of excellent quality. The content is logically presented, technically accurate, and contributes meaningfully to the field. I have no remarks or objections.

I confirm that there is no conflict of interest regarding the reviewed paper

✔

I confirm that I have the appropriate expertise to review this paper

✔