Review of an manuscript submitted to the conference

Article’s title
Does the paper match the scope of the conference?
Yes
Does the paper title reflect the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the paper embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Is the paper clearly written and easily understood?
Easily understood
Do conclusions illustrate the research results, findings, and recommendations, providing suggestions for future research?
Yes
Are the references full and grounded?
Yes
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article

This thesis presents valuable findings on the synthesis and characterization of organic-inorganic bromide perovskites for solar cell applications. A key highlight is the discovery that using a polar solvent like dimethylformamide (DMF) leads to preferential growth of nanoclusters along the [h00] direction. This specific orientation is crucial for efficient charge carrier transport, making these materials promising for high-performance devices.

The detailed experimental methodology, utilizing techniques like FTIR, XRD, SEM, and XPS, provides a solid foundation for the conclusions. The identified chemical instability in samples from aqueous solutions also offers important insights for future synthesis optimization.

Overall, the thesis effectively communicates the significant impact of solvent choice on perovskite properties, underscoring the potential of DMF-synthesized perovskites for high-efficiency solar films.

I confirm that there is no conflict of interest regarding the reviewed paper
I confirm that I have the appropriate expertise to review this paper