Review of an manuscript submitted to the conference

Article’s title

Lignocellulous Raw Materials and Its Wastes Transformation Into Value-Added Products

Does the paper match the scope of the conference?

Yes

Does the paper title reflect the content and purpose of the article?

Yes

Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?

Yes

Does the paper embrace contemporary issues in the area?

Yes

Is the paper clearly written and easily understood?

Easily understood

Do conclusions illustrate the research results, findings, and recommendations, providing suggestions for future research?

Partially

Are the references full and grounded?

Yes

Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article

Important and interesting subject. However, the conclusions require more work and better care, which in the current version are presented in a laconic manner. This decreases the value of the work.

I confirm that there is no conflict of interest regarding the reviewed paper

✔

I confirm that I have the appropriate expertise to review this paper

✔