Article’s title
Does the paper match the scope of the conference?
Yes
Does the paper title reflect the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the paper embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Is the paper clearly written and easily understood?
Easily understood
Do conclusions illustrate the research results, findings, and recommendations, providing suggestions for future research?
Yes
Are the references full and grounded?
Yes
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
1) It would be better to enhance the concept with the experimentally obtained results. Now it's just an idea, but let's hope it works.
2) It's recommended to use the term "thermal agent" instead of "heat carrier".
3) It's recommended not to use a combination of words "cooling coolant".
I confirm that there is no conflict of interest regarding the reviewed paper
✔
I confirm that I have the appropriate expertise to review this paper
✔