The text contains several grammatical and stylistic inaccuracies that require revision. For example, the phrase “To such drinks of the resulting product” lacks clear meaning and appears to be a result of automatic translation. There are also instances of incomplete or unprofessional sentence structure, such as “Expanding the range...”, which lacks both a subject and a verb, rendering the sentence fragmentary and unclear in academic writing. Additionally, some formulations—such as “These improvements contribute to reducing carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxide emissions”—while grammatically correct, are stylistically inconsistent with the surrounding context and would benefit from rephrasing to maintain lexical cohesion. In several parts of the text, tautologies and overly complex phrasing can be found, which reduce overall readability and hinder the comprehension of the main message. It is recommended to simplify such sentences, eliminate redundancies, and ensure stylistic consistency throughout the sections.
Article’s title
Does the paper match the scope of the conference?
Yes
Does the paper title reflect the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the paper embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Is the paper clearly written and easily understood?
Understood with effort
Do conclusions illustrate the research results, findings, and recommendations, providing suggestions for future research?
Yes
Are the references full and grounded?
Yes
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
I confirm that there is no conflict of interest regarding the reviewed paper
✔
I confirm that I have the appropriate expertise to review this paper
✔