Review of an manuscript submitted to the conference

Article’s title

Selenium-Modified Microgels: Novel Catalysts for Cross-Phase Oxidation of Aromatic Aldehydes

Does the paper match the scope of the conference?

Yes

Does the paper title reflect the content and purpose of the article?

Yes

Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?

Yes

Does the paper embrace contemporary issues in the area?

Yes

Is the paper clearly written and easily understood?

Easily understood

Do conclusions illustrate the research results, findings, and recommendations, providing suggestions for future research?

Yes

Are the references full and grounded?

No

Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article

1. The paper does not contain references.

2. Before introducing an abbreviation, authors should spell out the full term first, followed by the abbreviation in parentheses. Does "PVCL-based microgels" correspond to poly(N-vinylcaprolactam)-based microgels?

3. The authors did not give any explanation as to how phenol could be formed in benzaldehyde oxidation reactions.

I confirm that there is no conflict of interest regarding the reviewed paper

✔

I confirm that I have the appropriate expertise to review this paper

✔