Does the paper match the scope of the conference?
Yes
Does the paper title reflect the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the paper embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Is the paper clearly written and easily understood?
Easily understood
Do conclusions illustrate the research results, findings, and recommendations, providing suggestions for future research?
Yes
Are the references full and grounded?
Yes
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
The abstract presents a comprehensive study on the synthesis of new multifunctional composites based on green clay and hydroxyapatite. The authors successfully combined readily available natural materials with modern analytical methods, such as FTIR spectroscopy and nitrogen adsorption/desorption analysis, which enabled a deeper characterization of the obtained materials. Particularly noteworthy is the detailed description of the structural and functional properties of montmorillonite and hydroxyapatite, which demonstrate strong potential for use in the development of nanocomposites for medical and technological applications. I have no comments or objections to this abstract.
I confirm that there is no conflict of interest regarding the reviewed paper
✔
I confirm that I have the appropriate expertise to review this paper
✔