Does the paper match the scope of the conference?
Yes
Does the paper title reflect the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the paper embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Partially
Is the paper clearly written and easily understood?
Understood with effort
Do conclusions illustrate the research results, findings, and recommendations, providing suggestions for future research?
Partially
Are the references full and grounded?
Partially
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
There are a few remarks on the paper's material:
1) It's not clear why the period 2011-2020 was chosen.
2) What do the abbreviations in the Fig. 1 mean?
3) What is the main conclusion of the work? Why did author collect all the information?
4) The paper contains grammatical mistakes and must be edited before the publication.
I confirm that there is no conflict of interest regarding the reviewed paper
✔
I confirm that I have the appropriate expertise to review this paper
✔